Jump to: navigation, search

V4/External Authentication

Name: V4/External Authentication
Tickets: #5764 , #5765 , #5959 , #4189 , #5011 , #6225
Target version: 4.5.0
Author: simo
Incomplete.png Pending review
Last updated: 2016-12-19 by Pvoborni

Overview

In modern systems sometimes users need to be allowed to authenticate using alternative protocols, like Federation protocols (SAML) or Hardware Security Modules like Smart Cards (X509). This Feature captures the changes needed to allow these alternative authentication methods to interact with the FreeIPA UI and HTTP RPC pipes.

Use Cases

An Active Directory Domain User uses ADFS (SAML) to authenticate to a trusted IPA server, the user is known to the system but doesn't have Krb5 creds to interact with the framework.

A Smartcard owner wants to log in to the Web UI using the smartcard without having to rely on PKINIT for Single Sign On. The user can be authenticated via X509 certs to Apache but lacks krb5 creds to interact with the framework.

Design

The solution is to allow the apache authentication modules to map the user to an identity known by IPA and then impersonate the user by requesting a ticket from the KDC (Protocol Transitioning).

Ext-Auth.svg

The image above represent the final architecture implementing external authentication.

Workflows

The classic workflow where mod_auth_gssapi obtains a ticket and stores it in a credential cache to be used by the ipa sever framework changes to handle two different workflows: - External Authentication workflow. - Negotiate authentication with kerberos credentials workflow. The form based authentication internal workflow also changes slightly but it is substantially the same as the Negotiate workflow so it won't be explicitly covered.

External Authentication workflow

  1. A user authenticates to an Apache module (A1)
  2. After positive authentication the mod_lookup_identity module matches the authenticated user to the correct IPA user via SSSD (A2).
  3. With the correct principal name, mod_auth_gssapi performs a s4u2self operation to obtain a ticket for the HTTP service on behalf of the authenticating users (A3). The s4u2self step is actually done via privilege separation interposition by gssproxy.
  4. An (encrypted) credential is returned to mod_auth_gssapi, which proceeds to store it in a ccache file (A4) that can be read by both the Apache user and the 'ipaapi' user used to run the framework.
  5. The workflow proceeds with step X described later.

Negotiate authentication with kerberos credentials workflow

  1. A user with a kerberos ticket authenticates to mod_auth_gssapi (B1), this happens via gssproxy interposition (B2) as the Apache server does not have direct access to the HTTP keytab.
  2. An (encrypted) credential is returned to mod_auth_gssapi, which proceeds to store it (B3) in a ccache file that can be read by both the Apache user and the 'ipaapi' user used to run the framework.
  3. The wrokflow proceeds with step X described later.

Applications operations

X. When the applications (ipa framewrok/dogtag/etc..) needs to talk to the LDAP server (C1) it performs the usual s4u2proxy step using these encrypted credentials (C2). the encrypted credentials are read from the file ccache and are passed back to gssproxy which performs the actual s4u2proxy operation as well as the context establishment operation between HTTP and LDAP.

Main Changes

A few key changes to the current FreeIPA framework setup are needed:

  • GSS-Proxy will need to be started on the box and given exclusive access to the HTTP keytab, the configuration of GSS-Proxy must allow impersonation only by the apache process (either via SELinux labels or process uid) and allow proxying only by the Framework process (again SELinux labels or process uid). 4189
  • All the processes comprising the FreeIPA framework (Apache, framework user, helper scrips) will need to be configured to be intercepted by GSS-Proxy 4189
  • The Framework will need to be moved to a separate process interfaced via mod_wsgi, so that the framework is not operating as the apache user. 5959
  • credentials caches will need to be passed between the apache process and the framework process, either by setting up a shared file area, or by message passing of some kind (initially a shared file area where both the apache user and the framework user can write is probably sufficient).
  • The dogtag integration will finally need to be changed to use GSSAPI authentication instead of using a certificate for the RA agent. 5011 (this step can be done separately after the rest)

Implementation

The implementation requires changed to mod_auth_gssapi (PR92) and other parts of the apache authentication configuration. It also requires the introduction of GSS-Proxy to properly separate privileges between the components.

  • Dependencies:
    • New mod_auth_gssapi module including upstream PR92
    • New GSS-Proxy including access control for s4u2self VS s4u2proxy functionality


Feature Management

UI

How the feature will be managed via the Web UI.

CLI

Authntication plugins for the CLI are TBD, the first goal is to get the browser workflow working.

Configuration

Any configuration options? Any commands to enable/disable the feature or turn on/off its parts?

Upgrade

Configureation changes will be needed in various parts of FreeIPA. The Framework will need to operate as a different user from the local apache user:

  • Create a new system user
  • Change/check file permissions for this new user
  • Change/check access permissions for any socket based interaction

GSS-Proxy needs to be started:

  • New service to be started by FreeIPA
  • New configuration snippets specific to the FreeIPA use case
  • SELinux Policy to make sure all the parts can properly communicate with GSS-Proxy
  • IPA Keytab permissions need to be changed so that only GSS-Proxy can access it

How to Use

Easy to follow instructions how to use the new feature according to the use cases described above. FreeIPA user needs to be able to follow the steps and demonstrate the new features.

The chapter may be divided in sub-sections per Use Case.

Test Plan

Test scenarios that will be transformed to test cases for FreeIPA Continuous Integration during implementation or review phase. This can be also link to source in cgit with the test, if appropriate.

External links